No. 21-340

Orlando Carter v. District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-09-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-right court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process groppi-precedent groppi-v-wisconsin impartial-jury venue venue-change
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals' categorical prohibition on changes of venue deprives defendants of the right to trial by an impartial jury

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals’ categorical prohibition on changes of venue deprives defendants of the right to trial by an impartial jury in violation of this Court’s decision in Groppi v. Wisconsin, 400 U.S. 505 (1971).

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Reply of petitioner Orlando Carter filed.
2021-12-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 8, 2021.
2021-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2021.
2021-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 29, 2021 to November 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-29
Response Requested. (Due October 29, 2021)
2021-09-24
Brief amicus curiae of D.C. Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)

Attorneys

D.C. Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
R. Trent McCotterBoyden Gray & Associates PLLC, Amicus
R. Trent McCotterBoyden Gray & Associates PLLC, Amicus
Orlando Carter
Jessica Ring AmunsonJenner & Block LLP, Petitioner
Jessica Ring AmunsonJenner & Block LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent