No. 21-354

David Solomon v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Second Circuit erred in dismissing David Solomon's claims when uncontroverted evidence existed that he invoked federal jurisdiction first and that he was never given a meaningful hearing in a New York administrative forum, thus denying him due process?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Second Circuit erred in dismissing David Solomon’s claims when uncontroverted evidence existed that he invoked federal jurisdiction first and that he was never given a meaningful hearing in a New York administrative forum, thus denying him due process? 2. Whether the Second Circuit erred in denying David Solomon leave to amend his complaint to state a claim for religious discrimination? 3. Whether the Second Circuit erred in denying David Solomon any relief from bad-faith litigation conduct including the intentional destruction of surveillance video and other information that would have enabled David Solomon to identify and sue persons who falsely accused him of committing crimes?

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-14
Waiver of right of respondents Amazon.com, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc., and Jay Warren to respond filed.
2021-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 7, 2021)

Attorneys

Amazon.com, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc., and Jay Warren
Carmen Athanase NicolaouThe Chartwell Law Offices, Respondent
David Solomon
Norman A. Pattis — Petitioner