No. 21-355

In Re Larry Klayman

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-09-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: bar-admission bar-discipline client-interests constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice disciplinary-proceeding due-process legal-ethics presumption-of-innocence right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit err in denying admission pending a disciplinary proceeding, presuming guilt and harming client interests?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (“Eleventh Circuit”) err by denying Larry Klayman, Esq. (“Mr. Klayman”) admission pending the outcome of a bar disciplinary proceeding in the District of Columbia, thereby presuming him guilty until proven innocent and severely harming the interest of his clients?

Docket Entries

2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-08-31
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due October 7, 2021)
PetitionPetitionPetition

Attorneys

Larry Klayman
Larry Elliot Klayman — Klayman Law Group, P.A., Petitioner
Larry Elliot Klayman — Klayman Law Group, P.A., Petitioner