Did Judge Kumar and the Executives of the Judges' RICO Enterprise made frauds upon the court

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In 1936, Halsted L. Ritter, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida was Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, March 2, 1936, on charges of favoritism in the appointment of bankruptcy receivers and practicing law while sitting as a judge; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, April 17, 1936. ' Other judges that made similar acts to Ritter's and met the same similar fates are: 1. Robert W. Archbald, Commerce Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, July 11, 1912, on charges of improper business relationship with litigants; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, January 13, 1913. 2. Alcee L. Hastings, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, August 3, 1988, on charges of perjury and conspiring to solicit a bribe; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, October 20, 1989. 3. G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, March 11, : 2010, on charges of accepting bribee and making false statements under penalty of perjury; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, December 8, 2010. The source of the above information is: 1. There is a Michigan judges RICO Enterprise that was involved in the proceedings of the lower courts both state and federal. } 2. The Enterprise is an illegal, illicit law-firm that is owned, managed, oper| ated, controlled and directed by Michigan judges which includes but are not limited to Kumar, Matthews, Grant, Warren, Chabot, Servitto, Beckering and Ft Hood 3. The Enterprise is masked, cloaked and disguised in business by attorney Lincoln G Herweyer, Timothy Young, and the Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho PLC and they have posed as attorneys for the Enterprise's client — DTE. | 4. DTE has an open contract with the Enterprise for litigation services in PO | A32211400. ii a | | 5. Judge Kumar and the Executives of the Judges' RICO Enterprise made _ frauds upon the court when: ‘ 1. They litigated cases for DTE under DTE-to-Enterprise PO A382211400 between 2/5/2013 and 6/21/2021, 2. They furthered the specialized 2013 conspiracy and contract between DTE, Judge Kumar and the Enterprise to defraud the court for court orders, which DTE would otherwise, not have been able to obtain by law, facts and evidence, 3. They violated Canon 4(H) of the Michigan code of Judicial conduct, the RICO Act and my civil rights. The Questions Presented are: I Did Judge Kumar and the Executives of the Judges' RICO Enterprise made frauds upon the court when: 1. They litigated cases for DTE under the DTE-to-Enterprise PO A32211400 between 2/5/2013 and 6/21/2021, 2. They furthered the specialized 2013 conspiracy and contract between DTE, Judge Kumar and the Enterprise to defraud the courts for court orders, which DTE would otherwise, not have been able to obtain by law, facts and evidence, 3. They violated Canon 4(H) of the Michigan code of Judicial conduct, the RICO Act and my civil rights? II Can Res judicata, the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Judicial immunity bar and dismiss my complaints, when their elements have not been met? III Does The Supreme court's rules 10(a), (b), (c) provides strong and compelling reasons for Grant of this Petition? . ; iti