Is the Fourth Circuit in violation of Supreme Court precedent and in conflict with other circuits when, in conducting a harmless error review, it intentionally does not consider derivative evidence that was obtained as a result of the unconstitutional car search?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the Fourth Circuit in violation of Supreme Court precedent and in conflict with other circuits when, in conducting a harmless error review, it intentionally does not consider derivative evidence that was obtained as a result of the unconstitutional car search? 2. Is the Fourth Circuit in violation of Supreme Court precedent and in conflict with other circuits when, in conducting a harmless error review, it assesses not the impact of the suppressed evidence on the jury, but rather assesses only the overall strength of the Government’s untainted evidence?