Whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars a criminal defendant from relitigating issues that were previously decided against him in a civil action

No question identified. : __| UNDber He bocitawme OF IANS DOCIRAWME OLLATE RAY . —_ LESyvoregec. | | SES SO Viegas OF A CRiTtWWaL ACTON +R ES AS Ith Sy CERRE VES RQ 2038 CAd 134 9 (sEcbmnb Ciacnsy BOON IKQUOTNG FEE RMEN DECT. STDRES Tce _ |B AY C-EdBd IOS UGS. AD see | _ismes, USOE ad bl AZh (SECOND | | | “iReury BOOT). | __ | Anh Moctkine OF COLLATERAL ESOP et | 2.1 NOES A ibs. strict CQouer Have HE Pouter Orb ORLIGATOn) 1 | isituss Comer: fir SULA — iSPOMVE ON RES TDWWCATA , ROUNAS WIHEN Ee VIGATION HisiORY : LAd Avy4d AlS® SPE ST PieRer : [Vv NyveR" 2038 £ 3d S44 394. _ 1 Scand CiaculT 2000) Quotinic [Cen