1. WhetheR The PetitioNeR DAMON Cook HAS MAde A SubStantiaL Showing Of The DeNial Of A ConStitutioNAL RighT PursuanT TO 28 USC 2253(C)(2) IN ORdeR To ObtaiN A CertiFicate OF APPeaLAbilitY ?DeNiaLoFDuE Process"

2.) WhetheR The PetitioNeR"s 3Rd Rule loolb)lo) MotioN WAS Timely Filed WithiN A ReaSoNAble Time AfteR The 9thcircuiT S CASE OF: BYNOE V. BACA

3.)WhetheR The PetitioNeR"s 3Rd Rule loo(b)(l6) MotioN PreSeNted ExtrAordiNArY CircumStances Warranting RE-OPENiN9 The FiNAL JUd9MeNT AS ALL(lo) PhelPs' FactORS Supported d ReCoNSideriNg The District CouRT ?S 2002 HAbeas CorAus JudgMeNT

4.WhetheR There WAS INSUFFiCieNT Evidence of Force To Establish PetitioNeR DAMON Cook's Guilt ReasoNAble BeYoNd A Doubt

5.) WhetheR The District COURt PetitioNeR DAMON CooK's deNial of 3Rd S6 Rule (O(b)() MotiONS Was AN Abuse of Discretion ?

Whether the petitioner DAMON Cook has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 USC 2253(c)(2) in order to obtain a certificate of appealability?