Riccardo Green v. Washington State Employment Security Department
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment Securities
Whether the Washington State Supreme Court erred in judgment and abused discretion
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. Whether or not the Washington State Supreme Court erred in judgement & abused discretion when it failed/refused to grant the Petition for Review under RAP 13.4(b)(1-4), RCW 34.05.570(4)(b), & RCW 34.05.526 violate the Petitioner’s Substantive & Procedural Due Process Rights & Equal Protection Rights, & violate the Washington State Constitution Articles I § 1, 2, 3, 10, 12, 28, 29, 30; XXV § 1; XXVII § 1, 2; XXXI § 1; & the U.S. Constitution 5 & 14% Amendts.; & Articles III § 2 & VI§ 2? 2. Whether or not the Washington State Supreme Court erred in judgement & abused discretion when it failed/refused to grant the Motion for Reconsideration under DRJ Rule 9(d)(e) violate the Petitioner's Substantive & Procedural Due Process Rights & Equal Protection Rights, & violate the Washington State Constitution Articles I § 1, 2, 3, 10, 12, 28, 29, 30; XXV § 1; XXVII § 1, 2; XXXI § 1; & the U.S. Constitution 5 & 14 Amendts.; & Articles III § 2 & VI § 2? 38. Whether or not the Washington State Supreme Court erred in judgement & abused discretion when it failed/refused to enforce Washington State Laws against the Respondent & Mr. Jacob W. Dishion violate the Washington State Constitution Articles I § 1, 2, 3, 10, 12, 28, 29, 30; XXV § 1; XXVII § 1, 2; XXXI§ 1; & the US. Constitution 5t & 14% Amendts.; & Articles III § 2 & VI § 2? 4. Whether or not the Washington State Supreme Court erred in judgement & abused discretion when it failed/refused to enforce Sanctions & RPC violations including but not limited to RPC 1.3, 3.3, 4.1, 4.3, 8.4 against the Respondent & Mr. Jacob W. Dishion violate the Washington State Constitution Articles I § 1, 2, 3, 10, 12, 28, 29, . . . ii 30; XXV § 1; XXVIT § 1, 2; XXXI § 1; & the U.S. Constitution 5t & 14% Amendts.; & Articles III § 2 & VI § 2? 5. Whether or not the issues presented in the PFR under RAP 13.4(c)(5) & issues related to the “assignments of error” in the Appellant Brief filed in the Washington State Court of Appeals Division One under RAP 10.2(a) resolved by Washington State COA Division One or by the Washington State Supreme Court? | | ' t iti