No. 21-438

Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
CVSGAmici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: appellate-review claim-construction infringement jury-trial jury-verdict patent patent-law seventh-amendment sua-sponte
Key Terms:
Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-16 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Seventh Amendment allows the Federal Circuit to reverse a jury verdict based on a sua sponte new claim construction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 US 370 (1996), this Court held that the meaning of terms in a patent “claim” stands as a question of law and must be construed by the court. Under the Seventh Amendment, if requested by the patent owner, the jury must make the factual determination as to whether the defendant infringed the patent in light of the court’s claim construction. Consistent with the Seventh Amendment, the Markman decision leaves to the jury all factual determinations beyond the court’s construction of the claim. The question presented by this petition for writ of certiorari is: Whether the Seventh Amendment allows the Federal Circuit to reverse a jury verdict based on a swa sponte new claim construction of a term the district court concluded was not a term of art and construed to have its plain and ordinary meaning; where the Federal Circuit’s sua sponte claim construction essentially recasts a specific infringement factual question, previously decided by the jury, as a claim construction issue, to be decided de novo by the appellate court.

Docket Entries

2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-24
Supplemental brief of petitioner Olaf Sööt Design, LLC filed.
2022-05-11
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2022-01-10
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2021-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Reply of petitioner Olaf Sööt Design, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-12
Brief of respondents Daktronics, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2021-10-12
Response Requested. (Due November 12, 2021)
2021-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Daktronics, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Daktronics, Inc., et al.
Kenneth L. BresslerBlank Rome LLP, Respondent
Kenneth L. BresslerBlank Rome LLP, Respondent
Olaf Sööt Design, LLC
James Moore BollingerMcCarter & English LLP, Petitioner
James Moore BollingerMcCarter & English LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Amicus
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Amicus