Whether the D.C. Circuit's decision to dismiss the case based on disputed facts noticed sua sponte and without due process was improper

QUESTIONS PRESENTED WHETHER THE D.C. CIRCUITS DECISION TO DISMISS THE CASE BASED ON DISPUTED FACTS NOTICED SUA SPONTE AND WITHOUT DUE PROCESS WAS IMPROPER. WHETHER THE LACK OF GUIDANCE FROM THIS COURT HAS RESULTED IN CONFUSION ABOUT APPROPRIATE SCOPE OF JUDICIAL NOTICE AS TO THE TRUTH OF FACTS CONTAINED IN ONLINE MEDIA PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT. ii PARTIES The Petitioner below) is Bilal Abdul Kareem, a United States citizen and journalist. The Respondents below) are William J. Burns, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Llyod J. Austin ITI, the Secretary of Defense; Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Merrick Garland, the Attorney General of the United States; Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence; Jake Sullivan, the National Security Adviser; the Departments of Defense, Justice, Homeland Security; and the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States of America.