George C. Vann v. Roane County Commission, et al.
SocialSecurity Immigration
Whether a party should be denied the right to question jurisdiction, accountability, and disclosure of the subject matter in an alleged estate with conflicting interests among the independent review of the alleged estate by the operating judiciary
No question identified. : | | | QUESTION. PRESENTED FOR REVIEW To preserve the Right of the Fifth and Fourteenth of the Constitution of the United States should a party be denied the Right to Question Jurisdiction, Accountability and Disclosure of the Subject Matter in an Aileged Estate with conflicting interests among the independent review of the alleged estate by the operating judiciary. Parties to the Case As Name in the Case Charles White, Individually and as the Clerk of the Roane County Commission, W.V. Richard Frum, Roane County Fiduciary Commissioner Andrew Patton, Esquire. Individually and as Counsel For Susan L. Brooks . Gregory Elliott, Esquire Individually and as Legally Counsel for George C. Vann, Heir, Beneficiary and Successor Trustee for the The George Anderson Vann, Jr. Revocable Trust Susan L. Brooks, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Alleged Estate(Instate) for George Anderson Vann, Jr. Dartene Hunt, Individually and as an heir and beneficiary to the alleged estate/ trust Mary Toohney, Individually and as an heir and beneficiary to the alleged estate/trust