No. 21-467
Clifton Merrill Parish v. Oklahoma, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: collateral-review criminal-conviction criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus indian-law oklahoma-law retroactivity supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced.
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-08
Reply of petitioner Clifton Merrill Parish filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-22
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2021-10-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 22, 2021.
2021-10-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 29, 2021 to November 22, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-26
Brief amicus curiae of Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyer's Association filed.
2021-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Clifton Merrill Parish
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyer's Association
Oklahoma, et al.
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent