No. 21-470
Eric Lee Brown v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure federal-rule-criminal-procedure judicial-precedent legal-standard plain-error precedent standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration Punishment HabeasCorpus EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration Punishment HabeasCorpus EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-error-can-be-plain
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an error can be “plain” within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) based on established legal principles, or whether an error can be plain only if controlling precedent has previously recognized the same error in precisely the same circumstances. (i)
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
Reply of petitioner Eric Lee Brown filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-11-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 8, 2021.
2021-11-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2021.
2021-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2021 to November 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Eric Lee Brown
Elisabeth Susan Theodore — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Petitioner
Elisabeth Susan Theodore — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent