Did the Supreme Court of Washington err in not enforcing the civil court case removal to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED, Rule 14.1(a) 1) Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON error and fail in its duty when not enforcing, not recognizing and ignoring the civil court case Removal to Federal Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d)? See 2). Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHING‘ TON error and fail in its duty when not enforcing, not recognizing and ignoring the Lack of Personal Jurisdiction over Petitioner. Daniel G. Szmania (Szmania) ; ' due to Lack of Service of Process by Wells Fargo Bank . . N.A., As Trustee for Bear Stearns Arm Trust 2007-3, (Wells)? Especially since the Washington State Appel: : late Court Division II, No. 50523-1-II, Ruled as such on January 3, 2019 saying on page 10: “We reversed | based on Wells Fargo’s improper service of process.” Ap, pendix 4. See , "22% . 8) Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHING; TON error and fail in its duty when not enforcing, not recognizing and ignoring the Res Judicata Doctrine that prohibits Wells from starting a new law suit against Szmania after a previous case was appealed by Szmania to THE SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES, No. 18-734, which the Petition was Denied Review on February 19, 2019?