Whether professional judgment rather than deliberate indifference is the proper constitutional standard for a claim of inadequate medical care

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether professional judgment rather than deliberate indifference is the proper constitutional standard for a claim of inadequate medical care brought against a secure juvenile detention center by a minor immigrant detainee in federal custody; and (2) Whether a minor’s claim for injunctive relief seeking medical treatment from a secure juvenile detention center may be redressed by the Court without a parent, guardian, or legal custodian joined as a party to the case.