Did the District Court err in its Rule 12(b)(6) analysis and dismissal of the complaint?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Without any indication from the District Court’s Opinion that it found a defect in Piaintiff’s pleadings or factual allegations of his Complaint, the District Court failed to follow the pleading standards required by this Court, including multiple instances of ignoring or refusing to provide a presumption of truth to Plaintiffs multiple, detailed factual allegations and related references to evidence from public sources which support Plaintiff’s claims. The ‘ defiance of the lower court to respect this Court’s precedents and follow the pleading standards of this Court, which was affirmed by the Appellate Court without comment, raises the following questions concerning the District Court’s Rule 12(b)(6) analysis and dismissal. a) Did the District Court err in finding, without explanation, that “there is no indication that the Gay Pride flag is associated with such animus” (Memorandum Opinion,