No. 21-496
Martez L. Smith v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: categorical-approach conspiracy criminal-law criminal-procedure guideline-interpretation overt-act sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the categorical approach for generic offenses applies to the offense of conspiring under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Application Note 1 and requires an overt act element
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the categorical approach for generic ; offenses applies to the offense of conspiring under US.S.G. § 4B1.2 Application Note 1 and requires an overt act element. : 2. Whether U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Application Note 1 : . is a valid and controlling interpretation of that guide, line. : i ii STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-09
Supplemental brief of petitioner Martez L. Smith filed. (Distributed)
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-04
Motion (21M12) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2021-08-04
MOTION (21M12) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-30
Motion (21M12) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2021-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Martez L. Smith
Joseph R. Palmore — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Petitioner
Joseph R. Palmore — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent