No. 21-498

James Conerly, et al. v. John Patrick Winn, Judge, Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review bias civil-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias recusal sealing-records standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Appellate Court erred in dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by affirming the District Court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ action on grounds that District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction? 2.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by rejecting Plaintiffs’ contention that the | District Court was bias against Plaintiffs by treating Defendant Sharif Tarpin | more favorably than Plaintiffs? , 3.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by directing the Clerk to Seal the | Exhibits? | | 4.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by failing to consider Plaintiffs’ Claim of Defendants Violating their Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional rights to | Due Process? . 5.) Whether the Appellate Court abused its discretion by not finding that the Family law Judges violated Plaintiffs’ Constitutional Rights To Due Process | by ordering Plaintiffs to not Video Tape in public? 6.) Whether the Appellate Court abused its discretion by not considering, finding and deciding Plaintiffs’ claim that Family Law Judge John P. Winn should have Recused or been Recused from Defendants Family Law Case? 7.) Whether the Appellate Court should have considered, found, and decided upon Plaintiffs’ issue concerning the family Law Judges’ orders becoming a conflict of interest problem? ) i .>

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-04
Motion (21M26) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2021-09-08
MOTION (21M26) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-27
Motion (21M26) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2021-08-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)

Attorneys

James Conerly, et al.
James Conerly — Petitioner
James Conerly — Petitioner