No. 21-5004
Bo Daniel Shafer v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel trial-counsel trial-procedure voir-dire witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the federal district court erroneously conclude that Bo Shafer's IAC claim regarding his trial counsel's performance during voir dire was without merit?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1. DID THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY CONCLUDE THAT : BO SHAFER*S IAC CLAIM REGARDING HIS TRIAL COUNSEL'S PER _ : FORMANCE DURING VOIR DIRE WAS WITHOUT MERIT? : 2. DID THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY CONCLUDE THAT SHAFER'S IAC CLAIM REGARDING HIS TRIAL COUNSEL'S PERFORMBand ANCE AS TO THE OUTCRY WITNESS IS WITHOUT MERIT? II. | va
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2021)