No. 21-5009
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review authentication cell-phone-evidence civil-procedure evidence evidence-authentication harmless-error judicial-discretion photographic-evidence
Key Terms:
ERISA Privacy
ERISA Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Special Appeals abused its discretion by deciding that the Circuit Court's error, admitting in evidence certain pictures from a cell phone without proper authentication, was harmless?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. Whether the Court of Special Appeals abused its discretion by deciding that the Circuit Court’s error, admitting in evidence certain pictures from a cell phone without proper authentication, was harmless? 2. Whether the Circuit Court erred by admitting in evidence certain other photographs without proper authentication? il Parties and Related Cases The names of all parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. There are no
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2021-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Eddie Tarver
William Lawrence Welch III — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Maryland
Daniel John Jawor — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent