No. 21-501
James Vincent Liott v. U.S. Bank National Association
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure concise-statement concise-statements-of-errors due-process ejectment ejectment-action legal-errors preliminary-objections standing trial-court-procedure
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court properly rule on Petitioner's Preliminary Objections to the Ejectment Action?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the trial court properly rule. on Petitioner's Preliminary Objections to the Ejectment Action; . : Answer: NO , The trial court did not consider the Petitioner's Concise Statements of Errors Complained of on Appeal. , Should the trial court have considered the Petitioner's Concise Statements of Errors Complained of on Appeal; ' Answer: YES a See:
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2021-12-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-11-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-10-29
Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Bank National Association to respond filed.
2021-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)
Attorneys
U.S. Bank National Association
Leon P. Haller — Purcell Krug & Haller, Respondent
Leon P. Haller — Purcell Krug & Haller, Respondent