Under the constitutional provisions and guaranties of the 14th Amendment due process and equal application of the law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 Under the constitutional provisions and guaranties _ | of the USC. A™ Bmendment due prdcess and —egual application of the law, providing that | Phere are Nd tnvidiaus discriminations 7 between (persons. or different Qroups of _.partonsin blccoants 2° a LE Sudgments. of State.court of last resort 7 __ dismisses , Without argument ov Opinion, Writ of error. from judgment of trial court di sy ssing , _toithouwt conducting hearing or atheruise deter—hiining. footual jssuds-presen ted, petitions |. of prisoners containing fachual allegations | which, if true, show that they are being held is -in_cushdy in violation of federal consti| tvtoyal_rights, require that case be vacated | and remanded to state court fr pesolution? | 3. Can challenges to a courts subject Matter javisdiation be raised at any | , _time from Conuretion iy obtained , outside the junisdiction of a court? | BF | * e @ 4a Are, judgments entered null and void when the ‘alleqatronsaccur outside the | . boundaries of the state infaderal | §. when State. Dis trict Couct of Appeal puts | up.a-Roadbloak +o Justice’ by issuing a | PerCuriam Aetivmed (26.8) deelsjon |. which effectively blocks State, _ | -Supreme Court rewew, after Rulin ge | contravy te State Supreme Co ur iq a precedent, does jd s tice reguire the a. United States Supreme Cotwt 4 reverse 7 | and remand to the state courts +. | resolve the conflict andfollow the 6 When a. states decisians are contrary. | to cited Federal Gonstitutional =. pbs Visions..aad gquanan Fees and ul a/ 6. tablished and consi ten ff Mellowed — hate | aw on tdentical points of la heguire | thet because of due process and egual 7 avelicaton of the Law Quand r tees; cr ue p reme Court of United States will not . dsmiss writ of cerfiorany, but, whene..st _ appears To court on appeal that stote law /s applicable rather than. federal law, itwill vacate judgment and remand cause for enforcement of applicable princi plas of State law.°P | ZUnder the precedent set femth by this Hanorate count in tieb¢ Vv. OKlahoma, F447 US343 346 (19@0) ave all Stabe courts legally reguired to follow their own laws and ‘tutes that are constitutionally mandated and | protected. under the umbralla of the | tinted States Constitution (u.s.c) [4 th | Amendment equal application of the law guaran tees? dw 7 2 When a_Petitioner paises the claim | that. contrary to. federal constitutional. rights. he. stands convicted of an unnoticed ee an uncharged crime, that. he didnot reguest and is"NOT_in listof lesser included offenses”,are state courts rit q @ @ , required to_address that claim. ob regu est | the State Attorney General respond ‘on temand tothe trial court tp address | -the merifs_of the claim? | foe 9. Is a conviction that is. obtained by -. Known ase of perjured and. false testimony | Mold under the due process clause of the [4 — Amendment to the United Stotes Constitution . | ond the precedents. set forth in: Mooney vu | Holohan, 297 UWS. (03,112 (1935); Mapas. _ ILlinors, 360. WS. 264, at 267 and I72A(II9; Giglio v, United States, IOS.U5, 150, 155-194 __ | Gaia) and Uni ted. Stakes, v. Bagley, 473 us. 667, 680 (1988) P | 1O.Is a person held in custedy under a State | | conviction of a crime iniolahon ofhis. | Federal constitutional mghts entitled to. his day in court for resolution of those issues when the_state courts have made... MO. Factual Findings. on the merits of the claims. Under this Courts precedent th Jennings Ve. Illinois, 342 Ws, (04, 110-1 (igs) ? iv