No. 21-5030
Jonathan Mark Brinda v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) 18-usc-3553a criminal-sentencing district-court-discretion due-process excessive-sentence sentencing sentencing-considerations statutory-considerations statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in sentencing the defendant excessively based on the statutory considerations in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a) and in imposing an excessive term of supervised release
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . A. AFTER DETERMINING MR. BRINDA HAD VIOLATED THE ; TERMS OF HIS SUPERVISED RELEASE, THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY SENTENCING MR. BRINDA EXCESSIVELY BASED ON THE STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS IN 18 U.S.C. §3553(a) AND IN IMPOSING AN EXCESSIVE TERM OF SUPERVISED RELEASE. 1
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Jonathan Brinda
Manuel Benjamin Russ — Manuel B. Russ, PLLC, Petitioner
Manuel Benjamin Russ — Manuel B. Russ, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent