No. 21-5031
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bradshaw-v-stumpf circuit-split court-of-appeals due-process involuntary-plea judicial-review kercheval-v-united-states plea-acceptance plea-bargaining supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Due Process rights were violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Petitioner’s Due Process rights were violated when the Court of Appeals failed to remedy the District Court’s improper acceptance of Petitioner’s unknowing and involuntary plea, which conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bradshaw v. Stumpf, 545 U.S. 175 (2005) and Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220 (1927)? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Luis Pitt
Robin Smith — Law Office of Robin C. Smith, Esq., P.C., Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent