No. 21-5032
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: daubert daubert-standard evidence evidence-admissibility expert-testimony feature-comparison federal-rules-of-evidence reliability-standard scientific-methodology scientific-reliability subjective-feature-comparison
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Related Cases:
21-5013
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Federal Rule of Evidence 702 require lower courts to properly analyze the admissibility of evidence involving subjective feature-comparison methods under appropriate scientific principles including multiple, independent, blind-box studies
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Federal Rule of Evidence 702 require lower courts to properly analyze the admissibility of evidence involving subjective featurecomparison methods under appropriate scientific principles including multiple, independent, blind-box studies to ensure that the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods. i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Paris Poe
Patrick W. Blegen — Blegen and Garvey, Petitioner
Patrick W. Blegen — Blegen and Garvey, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent