No. 21-5040

Joseph A. Cunningham, Jr. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: banking civil-rights consumer-protection contract-law due-process mortgage
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Mortgage Loan transaction is legal, given the issues raised regarding the Deceptive or Unconscionable nature of the Mortgage Contract, the Irregularities in the Mortgage Evidence, and the Parties' compliance with Regulations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED D) Tria Merbang « Vronsaction A loan of @ Fevevtwint aecoting de a eocyeg States Sapreme Coie YNeclision 2 3) Ace thvadk Pactey Mortgage Ven action ie Legal, Pee tasning Yow the Diels 3) Shout a. Mortgace be ere vaclesk ‘® the cCreelitye Does pot proce | FAW Artsclosnre of the Mortyage | Contrmck is extremely becepttve OR Unconscrorakle ? , 4) Dih the UnvreA Shatter Daprre Deer eee Povek DP. ors enn | Cikeo Bek of Wetlils Forge Foe Benkccea (RRequlani ties (0 +he Mortgage Evdesten 6 S) Dn Title wy usec of the Parte to Bequiations ak hecoowtin I orteyase o Are Lbhepe sevoreie f

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Joseph A. Cunningham, Jr.
Joseph A. Cunningham Jr. — Petitioner
Joseph A. Cunningham Jr. — Petitioner