No. 21-5041
Kosoul Chanthakoummane v. Texas
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Chanthakoummane is entitled to a new trial because trial counsel ignored his unequivocal direction to challenge his guilt during the culpability phase of his trial in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, Eight and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L A. Whether Mr. Chanthakoummane is entitled to a new trial because trial counsel ignored his unequivocal direction to challenge his guilt during the culpability phase of his trial in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, Eight and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. il PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS BELOW Both parties are identified in the case caption. Because neither party is corporation, a
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-19
Brief of respondent State of Texas in opposition filed.
2021-08-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 8, 2021.
2021-08-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2021 to September 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Kosoul Chanthakoummane
Carlo DAngelo — Carlo D'Angelo, PC, Petitioner
State of Texas
Lisa Braxton Smith — Respondent