No. 21-5045
Colvis Jerrod Higgins v. United States
Tags: alcohol-prohibition criminal-procedure drug-treatment due-process judicial-discretion plain-error sentencing sentencing-conditions special-conditions substance-abuse supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court plainly err when it imposed a special condition of supervised release requiring Mr. Higgins to abstain from alcohol and to attend drug treatment even though Mr. Higgins does not have a history of drug or alcohol abuse?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L Did the district court plainly err when it imposed a special condition of supervised release requiring Mr. Higgins to abstain from alcohol and to attend drug treatment even though Mr. Higgins does not have a history of drug or alcohol abuse? I. Did the district court plainly err when it failed to adequately explain the basis for the special alcohol prohibition and drug treatment condition? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Colvis Higgins
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent