No. 21-5051
Shangia Washington v. Cedric Taylor, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-circuit precedent prison prison-conditions qualified-immunity risk-of-harm subjective-knowledge
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is following its precedent prior to Hope v. Pelzer to require a prior case on all fours to demonstrate subjective knowledge?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is following its precedent prior to Hope v. Pelzer to require a prior case on all fours to demonstrate subjective knowledge? ii
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent Cedric Taylor, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Cedric Taylor, et al.
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent
Shangia Washington
McNeill Stokes — McNeill Stokes Attorney at Law, Petitioner