No. 21-5052

Walter Drummond v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2021-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: capital-punishment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process florida-constitution habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief procedural-due-process standing us-constitution writ-of-corpus
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How Can a legitimate Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied outside the guidelines of the Florida Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, How Can a legitimate Writ of Habeas Corpus be ® olenied’” iplease see to Exhibit 1) ovtside the guidelines of she Florida Constitution ;Ardrcle t, Section t$.Wabeas Corpus, U.S. Constitut fon j Sachion %, Clause 2, and Pec “US, Law” :€ “We The People Legal Primer ¢ Py.4) Whereas, in ail, i+ shipuiates ther Habees Corpus ss ‘la mather of right” and “never be suspend od Upless in “eases to Which ynis cause doesat pertain 2 2. In the Supreme Court of Flonidas’ agement wn AWis cause (please see to Exhibitt), i+ used an unspecified case 5 “Beker Vv. Stote 878 S.2di236 (Fie. July 5, 2004), thats basical sterickypice and talks in partisansh'p . in refarance to "Pattkioner inmates (Baker v. State, 878 So.Zd 1236; 1236) whe used writs of habeas cecpus to collaterally Artock non-capixal cenvictions” (Baker © “Procedural Pestuce ‘ and, where said the gexkions were unauthorized Pecause the proper velnicle for xne relic® sought was +rougn motions For . ast convickion relie€ , Nota+hece hasn't been an vpdate nor amendment . ; to Law, as this "Baker v. State ‘jis just a case deasion that needs to oe re-reviewed, but, in +has Petitioner s Cause, whichis, Accordingly ; _ svomitted 4o str! existing law 3 FS. Section 74.01 Apolication and Week. Lo. in char supper4 with Actiele |. Declaration ef Rights, Section 13-Habeas . Corpus, the Petitioner / Applicant’ i's the weed used in the foundations Law when reF erring to al/the Petdoneg ragerdless of their nature or Wherebuing ,"venide” (Baker ©1236) in which His Petitionsc [Applicant rowed Unlaw fol dekainment thravgn Record * State of Florida v Dewmmend, *01004343eFI0a, Trral Transceipt Page 370, lines 23-25% Affidavit Evidence . tn which , dovld obly be ereckivaly Sough* through F.S. Section 74.01 ,F.5A/ The Writ of Habeas Corpus, which wis reciked in Wis Writ to Xne Sopreme a. Coork of Foctda , WOW does Baker ¥.Sy2e even celates to this Petitions aause ¢ 1

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-04
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC to respond filed.
2021-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Inch, Sec., FL DOC
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Walter Drummond
Walter Drummond — Petitioner
Walter Drummond — Petitioner