No. 21-5054

Kevin Antonio Watson v. Virginia

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2021-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency habeas-corpus ninth-circuit prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-doubt sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the Commonwealth of Virginia proved the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt for the armed robbery and forcible sodomy charges

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED fe Whether after viewina the widence in the liaht moot’ favorable to the Prosecutions any ratanal Hier oF ‘Fact Could have Found the Common wealthoF Viwsinia p cove the essentiu elements beYenda Masonable deubt Far the MdewP+ fobher¥ and Foréible. Sodomy Charses 2 : | ; A Whethers Sufhtiert Aook sf one element but not the othe necessard essential elements will result in reversal % 2, whethes Courts can disresard credible unimGeached evidence of the Prosecution whith excullates the deolendant and Grates a reasonable. doubtt Y, Dees Henrico Count), Virginta Circutt+ Court have a Aud $0 grant the reheke thet Federal lacs re tutes then it Considers the merits of the Fedeval claim? |

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Kevin Antonio Watson
Kevin Antonio Watson — Petitioner