No. 21-5060

Kevin Brown v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-921 18-usc-922 circuit-split criminal-statute domestic-violence firearm-possession mens-rea rehaif-v-united-states statutory-interpretation united-states-v-hayes
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-11-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant must know his prior conviction qualified as a 'misdemeanor crime of domestic violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), a person may not possess a gun if he has been convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.” A “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” is a misdemeanor that (1) has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force, and (2) is committed by a person in a specified domestic relationship. United States v. Hayes, 555 U.S. 415, 426 (2009) (discussing 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A)). In Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), this Court held that in a § 922(g) prosecution, the government must prove that when a defendant possessed a gun, the defendant knew his status as a prohibited person—even if that means the government must prove that a defendant had knowledge of the law. The question presented, on which the circuits are split, is: Whether, in a § 922(g)(9) prosecution, Rehaif requires the government to prove that a defendant knew his conviction qualified as a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” including that his prior offense had, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force. i

Docket Entries

2021-11-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-20
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-20
Reply of petitioner Kevin Brown filed.
2021-09-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-08-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 8, 2021.
2021-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2021 to September 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Kevin Brown
Conrad Benjamin KahnFederal Public Defender, Middle District of Florida, Petitioner
Conrad Benjamin KahnFederal Public Defender, Middle District of Florida, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent