No. 21-5069

William Paul Burch v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bankruptcy-procedure circuit-court-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-precedent due-process judicial-overreach jurisdiction pro-se-litigation standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a Circuit court allowed to establish new precedence by disregarding and/or overruling twenty-four statutes written by the Congress of the United States and signed by the President of the United States as well as three articles of the United States Constitution and two Sections of the Texas Constitution that disagrees with their position?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Is a Circuit court allowed to establish new precedence by disregarding and/or overruling twenty-four statutes written by the Congress of the United States and signed by the President of the United States as well as three articles of the United States Constitution and two Sections of the Texas Constitution that disagrees with their position? Can a bankruptcy court establish new precedence supported by the Circuit Court allowing the bankruptcy court to disregard all jurisdiction rules, statutes, and procedures in an effort to accept cases that are not a part of a discharged bankruptcy case. May a Circuit Court enter a judgement partly based on issues that were not part of the appeal and occurred after the appeal was filed and was not part of the cases involved? : fo . . ii Can a pro-se Plaintiff filing in state court be declared a vexatious litigant by a bankruptcy court judge without the Plaintiff having filed any case in the bankruptcy ; court pro-se and the bankruptcy court demanding that a state court judge or another federal trial court judge must receive permission from the bankruptcy court judge before a motion is allowed to be filed in the state or federal court case that is not and never has been in the bankruptcy court?

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Freedom Mortgage Corporation to respond filed.
2021-08-04
Waiver of right of respondent Michael Weems: Hughes Watters Askanase, LLP; Specialized Loan Servicing LLC to respond filed.
2021-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Padfield & Stout, LLP and Mark W. Stout to respond filed.
2021-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Homeward Residential, Inc. and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC to respond filed.
2021-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association to respond filed.
2021-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Marc James AyersBradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Respondent
Homeward Residential, Inc. and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Thomas F. LooseLocke Lord LLP, Respondent
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Marcie L. SchoutQuilling, Selander, Cummiskey & Lownds, PC, Respondent
Michael Weems: Hughes Watters Askanase, LLP; Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Charles E Harrell Jr.Hughes Watters Askanase LLP, Respondent
Padfield & Stout, LLP and Mark W. Stout
Matthew B FrondaPadfield & Stout, LLP, Respondent
William Paul Burch
William Paul Burch — Petitioner