Whether the Supreme Court will order the immediate return of the children to their mother, Elizabeth Shaw, in violation of court orders, ICWA, MIFPA, federal law, state law, and tribal law

No question identified. : © quegnons <* 1. In violation of court orders, MIFPA, ICWA, federal law, state law, and tribal law, the Tribe illegally seized my children from their school and refuse to return them to my custody. The immediate return of the children to me, their mother, Elizabeth Shaw is required by 25 U.S.C. § 1920 and MCL 712B.19. Will the Supreme Court of the United States order the immediate return of my children? 2. Orders violating Elizabeth’s constitutionally protected rights were entered in excess of the court’s jurisdiction, absent due process, and contrary to equal protection under the law. “An order that exceeds the jurisdiction of the court, is void, or voidable, and can be attacked in any proceeding in any court where the validity of the judgment comes into issue.” Rose v. Himely (1808) 4 Cranch 241, 2 L ed 608. See also Vallely v. Northern Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920). Will the Supreme Court of the United States enter an order vacating the void orders and subsequent proceedings? 3. Elizabeth is not a respondent in the MCPP case initiated against father, Derek Shaw for the sexual abuse of MS. The children were ordered to remain home with Elizabeth under the jurisdiction of the divorce case. The Michigan Supreme Court abolished the one-parent doctrine deeming it a violation of due process. See In re Sanders, 495 Mich. 394, 407 (2014). Will the Supreme Court of the United States provide the active custody order and status of proceedings? ; PARTIES All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all