No. 21-5083
Corbin J. Breitenbach v. Kansas
IFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure discovery dna-testing due-process evidence habeas-corpus judicial-procedure
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Bieberlach's request for independent DNA testing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did Bre: Diskeck Couck alouse ths. discrekion ia _ Rero4ing Bieiberloach's . Tequesk Cor indepenterr DNA Kedkunay vo 7 2. Did Vre Dishadk Corr please es Sacrekron in Sery{ina, J Bacedvennndns ceoueds for nexa aEpawred Comsedli o 5. Dis Yre Dishack Cad aluse Ns discrelaon in denying . | Did Ye Scbe Vidllle Becentodn’s cue Pees’ Cephs boy Feadinuy Yo Usclose excubpubcny evidence of Kongerprink Yesking” | \O.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 11, 2021)