No. 21-5089
Martin Thomas Lawrence v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lafler-v-cooper plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-exposure sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, in light of trial counsel's express admission that he underestimated Petitioner's sentencing exposure if he went to trial, this Court should grant, vacate, and remand for further consideration under Lafler v. Cooper?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether, in light of trial counsel’s express admission that he underestimated Petitioner’s sentencing exposure if he went to trial, this Court should grant, vacate, and remand for further consideration under Lafler v. Cooper? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Martin Lawrence
Rockne Cole — Cole Law Firm, PC, Petitioner
Rockne Cole — Cole Law Firm, PC, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent