Can a media lawfully portray a ONE TIME One Count of Second Degree Breach of Peace arrest as 'ARRESTED FOR STALKING SEVERAL WOMEN?

No question identified. : i QUESTIONS AND ARGUMENTS ABOUT ALTICE/NEWS 12 CONNECTICUT REPORTING ‘ “Arrested for Stalking Several Women” and “Preying on Women’ as NOT being as Second Circuit Court of Appeals concludes “substantially true”. NOTE: Color coding used so to be consistent with how written in past Briefs. QUESTION #1: Can a media lawfully portray a ONE TIME One Count of Second Degree Breach of Peace arrest as “ARRESTED FOR STALKING SEVERAL WOMEN?” given the fact that the stalk or harass wording (Course of Conduct Behaviors and actual laws)) are not part of the Second Degree Breach of Peace Statute? QUESTION #2: | Can a media lawfully portray a ONE TIME One Count of Second Degree Breach of | Peace arrest as “ARRESTED FOR STALKING SEVERAL WOMEN’ given the fact } that the stalk or harass terminology/words are NOT DEPLOYED BY THE ARREST | WARRANT WRITING OFFICER? | QUESTION #3: Can a media lawfully portray a ONE TIME One Count of Second Degree Breach of Peace arrest as “ARRESTED FOR STALKING SEVERAL WOMEN” given the fact that no woman/women was/were ever quoted or willing to give a Sworn Written Statement let alone deploy the stalk or harass terminology in a complaint? } QUESTION #4: | If a media company are to choose different words (let alone laws) than the Arrest | Warrant, should a media company not be obligated to have names and/or actual quotes from alleged victim/s when deploying a subjective interpretation of an Arrest Warrant that never uses the words stalking or harassing? ; QUESTION #5: Why is the Second Circuit Court of Appeal NOT writing “ALLEGED totality of Lawrence’s conduct” given the fact the reader of the Arrest Warrant KNOWS that these past alleged one-time acts of as police wrote “get into personal space” are | theories, unproven, and unprovable because there are no arrests (Probable Cause) tied to these incidents let alone evidence for veritable stalking behavior? QUESTION #6: Does the Second Circuit Court accurately define the dictionary definition of stalking, stealth, and harass? QUESTION #7: ii Can fully KNOWN long past decades old complaints/calls of concerns to police and | resulting warnings devoid of any Probable Cause for any type of arrest (let alone the extreme arrest of stalking) and devoid of any evidence in the form of Sworn | Written Statements, video coverage, witnesses, any criminal record of such, etc ... | be lumped together as what the Second Circuit Court of Appeals writes “the totality | of Lawrence’s substantially true stalking conduct” at a public market? | QUESTION #8: Does the Second Circuit Court of Appeal have the right to even write “Lawrence’s documented history of following women in a harassing manner” when ) the Arrest Warrant writing officer himself never used the terms harassing or stalking (both Course of Conduct behaviors) and within Arrest Warrant writing officer’s Sworn Deposition Arrest Warrant officer quoted that he never thought of | using these words stalk or harass and opted for “get into personal space” — an actual | dictionary phrase that NEVER itself has the words harass let alone stalk within its definition? QUESTION #9: Is it right for me James Lawrence to NOW TO BE FOREVER PORTRAYED AS A “STALKER” devoid of any arrest or conviction let alone any person/woman accusing me of this behavior? QUESTION #10: Is it right for me James Lawrence to NOW TO BE FOREVER PORTRAYED AS A “STALKER” without any evidence in the form of stalking language within the one count of Second Degree Breach of Peace Arrest Warrant? QUESTION #11: Is it right for me James Lawrence to NOW TO BE FOREVER PORTRAYED AS A “STALKER” without any evidence in the form of stalking language within any past police Incident Report devoid of arrest? _ QUESTION #12: Given that other media picked up on this extremely false interpretation of the . Arrest Warrant, to which I now have a second federal lawsuit James Lawrence v. Hearst Communications, is not the Supreme Court a necessary forum to provide ‘