No. 21-510
PDVSA US Litigation Trust v. Lukoil Pan Americas, LLC, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: and raised in the appellate briefing to such an e appellate-procedure appellate-review argument-abandonment civil-procedure court-of-appeals district-court issue-preservation judicial-review legal-briefing merits-determination waiver
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court of appeals may deem an argument to have been abandoned when it was properly raised and fully briefed in the district court, and raised in the appellate briefing to such an extent that the court addressed the argument in its decision and found it to be meritorious
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a court of appeals may deem an argument to have been abandoned when it was properly raised and fully briefed in the district court, and raised in the appellate briefing to such an extent that the court addressed the argument in its decision and found it to be meritorious.
Docket Entries
2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-12
Waiver of right of respondents Lukoil Pan Americas, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Glencore, Ltd., Glencore Energy UK Ltd., Gustavo Gabaldon, Luis Alvarez, Sergio de la Vega
PDVSA US Litigation Trust
David Boies — Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Petitioner
David Boies — Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Petitioner