Whether the First District Court of Appeals unauthorized abrogation of an Essential Element of the statutory offense of Aggravated Assault deprived Daniels of his Substantive Rights, and to have his criminal conviction rest upon a jury's determination that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense as statutorily defined by the Florida Legislature?

QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether the First District Court of Appeals unauthorized abrogation of an | Essential Element of the statutory offense of Aggravated Assault deprived Daniels of his Substantive Rights, and to have his criminal conviction rest upon a jury’s ; determination that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense as ! statutorily defined by the Florida Legislature? | IJ. Whether the “egregiously invalid” legal reasoning espoused by the Florida ' | | First District Court of Appeals as a rational for denying Daniels’ appeal | | demonstrates a willful violation of the “separation of powers doctrine,” which | effectively denied Daniels his Sixth Amendment Right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation brought against him by the government? , i | et . |