No. 21-5118

Michael D. Dyers v. Georgia

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2021-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights conviction-court-dismissal due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel plea-agreement prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-appeal transcript-evidence
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the conviction court erred in dismissing the defendant's motion for out-of-time appeal based on no evidence showing the defendant lacked the right to appeal, when the defendant submitted evidence with the motion

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED SFO Cen” al Sipe ee CSP NB eect Te p: Apel of Georghp cas ) Deagy/ng motion, Oy i) $ Wao Moberials OC. GAR F-/ fo Ga) 7 -U-2e & @ , (Gj | (Fc a Ra ES TSE moHen is Cele cdl ho d/ing Aippen/ 8c 6. S-63a) 2 en iy eo SEE ASHE, Sudpocusl bosel eg OW ' @). Tho w CON Coart of Mp en Return documoat Sted “Theee «60 Pending (OSE iw {he Court of PPPERL whery Petitioner Ctef {NESE Mokigns in (onuichion Coork Rel Thens Soog kf ts peel Convdckion Gourts order of dismissal? GY) How can couviction court dismiss: motioal Gr-oat-ot fe -BROEe\ Base oN NO Evidence Showing DeLatont [lock t's Right fy Repent % hen Beeonlont sent Evidence itn motion 2 Alo Hew is tels Nof Showing udhen thls Eulcleuce £S Steel within tex Curl e€ notlon ShowIng Prook within Taascripts of case No. 2006 -CR(2%4-C pt peg 13, “a el een MotIon For Du to Hime Appeal |. Show 1 LOOK eat het Delend es (CelRined Ra ht 4 Aopen Gia en eerste ae Rane Pa) Alasiing’ TaouseRipt Peges weet Line Hit red er Rb 5 hia 6) How crn Coniet ion (ortt dewie couski'te hone! Rekts cree vg fA SCEEWtER pment ee GS Whew they pre Plaid iN Record P5ce afeis Con Sedge "Sage am egat EA aie tg cel HNpu)i ag iy aopoint Counsel oC Contlic alleeclis miss! & Gansel Lew the Pubic Dekeicters Kbice, weed Ductfwrelier, The w eppont Ric caster Bettas lis 4 tg, Same dice cabiicln, he peed (iCerton ts complet ; OAT be fCouusel ob. OD CAN C2Song K 7 Ss J CMe HSS to Bite aa as ee ED the BE RR Ue VIE baleen ne fo feep ito detttiding of Defewcloyfs Pig hk ia Hebeas corpus Ploceztiog purl tppel2 Pow caw fmbiguity be #lloued fo Stanel ns Mnowaing ty meet vobuwfecily rd antelliggnt wit phle counsel Enteting Inito Guilty Peg ane Signiag Pweiver of Rights OF Mane! Ant Hebens corpus why Counce | stotes frat he wPS wol present m¢Signi of wWHiver Non wes It 1W te Coutayt vie PlEA but wis enwalel fiaelalait aflce Kopin wal pes ke Couuse| Chiewt Me Pilly who he wes without conn se] bfesents 2 ard Wes Kol signed fe Befolont but 6s Editi ted info ofter Apers © Cowditions’ & © isl probetion aS iE tw rs S09 elf SEE EL. By, PRIS D8 Gta 113,17 ell nese 2. S Hod cow Poison cle ) Mtechineat s cusd, 0e(3 Sompacl AthIg7 5 Pil, SEE Guilty Plea Taeeiseripp. pages? ‘nel &) a IES piel lorkeAs Teewscnphspuoe Cy 1, HOw can’ A GutLTY Plea Be mrde oe gr reraee! Wingy y ve gpe ty oR valuterily when the PROSE cuter rs Allowed without absectiow by mettective, con€lict o& Infeest CO-con. “SL Public Det der Rretl Willis ; To “Thregu) iN Exfr+ Concitens Andi (Consequences), during the Pien heseing that Liv oad eacd Of or liscucced with my Citewt ” ode ? eee Tie fitowig § 2-Howe is this zntelti eit 23. tow is This yal. untied F 4Houw iS fitis Guilty PleA Ente 2ed wth Ettechve COUNSE! 2 How con convichled Covet ACLE?? Pier es THESE 7, liNlés 4, Through 2S, Avel pege y, ines 7 ly Aé < fein caught ioe (RPC te tl ara oe eel coe P. See OPT OAK. Lines 7 leeWeme GPT. Page Rewsmel AlSe See Bab loinc Spe eg r. s; oft PG fines , Thrughé, DO1S HABEAS CORPUS TreaUscarpt “WE Renamer fie fitch ite REVAMEd Pp. SEE HTD. 0. 1b lines 14 mel 28, mah oie PE “SM IY, 5, How crn This ples of Gully Re deena th. tl, Wes ¢ Thice OR re Migenty whew @N the contipct R ac Bergly 1 Qoluntorii AS PetiFlow To enter ¢ Per of Guilty Filect ZW syrah et me Hall COUNTY DUNE 12th 2067 a ase No ad Superior Cour Tne Stete of GEeoizgrA VERSES Michee (PD dD eR 4006 ebal ive) re Hebeds corpuc Court Lowndes counk ue Detenloat, Fri iN OF Knowingly and Vdlumter'ly pel inte ligc ee Ente pie, mS poe PlEA AS Respond eivts Exhibit fantion gulity Fuses nok wowed » copy & Jrif after Henting 50 Z couldnt lity 0s G-1d$3 Géoieg/a Habeas corpuc pet Sele sade olive. Th iS IN contradichion of Guilty PER contract iw Heber Corus i ‘)) SEing 'W Contracticty, guity ¢ me Tion To Enter @ Pe Raictden op Ain biguity of Pet cele Of COUNSE] © 7 anes ul ate Pape 10), Rt CE RHE hereby cetity thats” Lines Mt ORNEY York the dé tEegt Lb, “Cheve exdin WES Numbered 4 Thecua hk 6 4 ‘ E Expisiwed fe the de t

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2021)

Attorneys

Michael D. Dyers
Michael D. Dyers — Petitioner