Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) Ls (7 Abs€ of ARN celle iY CouEr niles AW Chedbe svsT Hinlaeg A lett ULkER poled Lene Fo NEMA, HE (fees rant A 7e whetle ae weT sth con plexed 73 lsaeeTion wi peritng sect AW Obie 13 CH a (UPR event Hoel Me AGUST 70 Aiteoe” Sch floidag LAS tide, Daw ry Pichidiie be Hitteatibe/, ont Ly Ye PRETY OF Coit; Hel «ketfhew’T COSTS, AT flty Tune Leke the puseore ab ctéverupere ps filte,, 0 KFTae dépugece Heel LOGE fhe Fecal of Me res Of . bhw teen, by tlie Yhe srt AS Hater ed Kyef seeing 44 Cy WN YE Adige /YTY, We ee Tiwwe yu telacl? be Ae ieee FREY HdsT kes pend jheeT° soll be Con Tif feever bee ole OF NOTICE ef ME AutenaiaenT , z WES He CHOUE oF HeTian fee HeTont eAed ty, IN A Keay UML PERCT UE cli, 4) Wold A KydadnuenT Te me CongdlanT, 7 Korine tented, (2000 yeucen neglgente Le Pert pol, 5) zs ai Findclitg F FATAL Lavo lence, A AER OME 4leMENT, [0 YUE CAUSE OF ACTow of HeTeL feud, z.