Did the Court of Appeals err in concluding that Petitioner's Certificate of Appealability had not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" under Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003); when Outrageous Government Conduct -fabrication of evidence by government officials-that shocks the conscience violates the Due Process Clause of the United States Fifth Amendment?

Did the Court of Appeals err in concluding that Petitioner's Certificate of Appealability had not 'made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right' under Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003), when Outrageous-Government-Conduct-fabrication-of-evidence-by-government-officials-that-shocks-the-conscience-violates-the-Due-Process-Clause-of-the-United-States-Fifth-Amendment