No. 21-5125

Reginald Lamont Thomas v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-consideration civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process judicial-council judicial-suspension retroactive-application sentencing-limits statutory-interpretation suspension time-limits
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How can the judicial council for the Ninth Circuit ratify an application to suspend the time limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3161 for the Eastern District of California?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED EL the covopessioval stave If US.C-S 4 2rFte) states” Hf the chie€ judge of vA dicleek covet concludes that a SUS pension of dime is of AREAL URgeHeM, he mau OFdcRthe limits suspended foe A pekiOd gol fo exceed Yiedy days aud Jo Apply to the judicAl council foe that cecuck. Withia OO)}ien das of edtey of such ofdet-) the. thief Judge. shall ApHLY tothe wWarayal couval of pre ORE (oR & SUBPeNSiON puRSUALE 40. subseckion CY “How CAD The WodIGAU comeal for the Wirth Cinevet RAO: | Appa ve. AY Application +o Suspend the Mime jinits of (¥ U.S.C5 % Alels fo the Easleen Disizict of Coticonsta Red was red (wenky: Wo days jale 2 >What poe +he CompessionnL avdfoe Statulo pues: Of the Enstetsl Disttich Bf CAL fon) [” jete npbucation tele April ¢ , 2020 Leow the wihal 2 dey supeNsSiod oO Naech (420202 ) A ceoedion, to the previous questina , does that gendee phe Casters) Dittict oF Catfornins application Aud Gee CfdekSs BOLL Amd yoda < > Whedhappedis when a yudtea at sSuspe UWSiond cytecds One. Wane. by, weeKs < | %) Why \s Xhe syatve of = \¢ UiS.0.5 $ SIFY Cb) VAQUE. PRA yok quoted jd ibs entinely ov the aAppucabios Apled Agee 2040 ( Appeetiy B) 2 ‘

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2021)

Attorneys

Reginald Lamont Thomas
Reginald Lamont Thomas — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent