No. 21-5127
Noel Aldana v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-review double-jeopardy due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance pro-se procedural-bar strickland-standard strickland-v-washington untimeliness
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a meritorious claim that a pro se Petitioner raises which clearly present and meet the cause and prejudice standard addressed in the Strickland v. Washington ruling overcome the bar of untimeliness?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Does a meritorious claim that a pro se Petitioner raises which clearly } present and meet the cause and prejudice standard addressed in the | | Strickland v. Washington ruling overcome the bar of untimeliness? Does a Double Jeopardy Violation that is on the face of the record and | properly raised on a petition/motion correctable by the honorable Supreme | Court of the United States? \ } | 7 oo | Be 7 ae ' |
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2021-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2021)
Attorneys
State of Florida