No. 21-5129
Gary E. Peel v. Barbara Zarrick
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence appellate-review district-court due-process federal-criminal federal-criminal-procedure habeas-corpus non-capital standing writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FirstAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a stand-alone (a/k/a free-standing) claim of 'actual innocence' is cognizable in a federal non-capital criminal case
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a stand-alone (a/k/a free-standing) claim of “actual innocence” is | : cognizable in a federal non-capital criminal case. | 2
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Barbara Zarrick to respond filed.
2021-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Barbara Zarrick
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent