Did Davis render 18 U.S.C. §2332b(a)(1)(B) equal to 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B), and thus equally make void and Unconstitutional both statute subsections (B), which affects predicate usage of the offenses listed under 18 U.S.C. §2332b(g)(5), an indivisible part of the 18 U.S.C. §2332b statute?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Did Davis render 18 U.S.C. §2332b(a)(1)(B) equal to 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B), and thus equally make void and Unconstitutional both statute subsections (B), which affects predicate usage of the offenses listed under 18 U.S.C. §2332b(g)(5), an indivisible part of the 18 U.S.C. §2332b statute ? THIS PETITIONER AVERS THAT THE ANSWER IS YES. (2) Is the Federal Arson statute, §2K1.4 also void and Unconstitutional in light of . the holding within 18 U.S.C. §924(e), [Johnson], §924(c)(3)(B), [Davis], and §16(b), : {Dimaya] ? Or at a minimum, the enhancement section of that Statute to Level 24 ? THIS PETITIONER AVERS THAT THE ANSWER IS YES. oo, (3) Should expedition be, as is the health and safety risk of this Petitioner under our ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic, [Petitioner is allergic to many vaccinations, thus ? . cannot take the COVID-19 vaccine without medical information, and FCI Greenville's "Doctor" Faisal Vakil Ahmed, [soon to be Injoined from practicing medicine without a medical license or even a permit, his permit in 1994, expiring in 1997, Faisal Vakil Ahmed practicing medicine in Illinois for over twenty years now, illegally]], thus no legal professional medical opinion of the issues of my allergies to several vaccines is a problem with the cOVID-19 vaccine; should this then . . cause the Court to expedite relief due this Petitioner ? . THIS PETITIONER AVERS THAT THE ANSWER IS YES. :