No. 21-5134
Wayne R. Reiner v. Cox Communications California, LLC
IFP
Tags: case-dismissal case-review ccp-391 civil-procedure court-sanctions due-process frivolous-claims judicial-discretion legal-standing vexatious-litigant
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment Securities
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Orange County Superior Court erred in determining that Reiner was a vexatious plaintiff under CCP 391 without reviewing the underlying merits of the 7 cases cited as frivolous, refiled or harassment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . In Orange County Superior Court case Reiner was determined to be a vexatious Plaintiff under CCP 391. The Court had reviewed and determined that 7 cases were statistically chosen with no review of the underlying cases as being frivolous, refiled or harassment.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Wayne R. Reiner
Wayne R. Reiner — Petitioner