Was the denial of Petitioner's request for a Certificate of Appealibility (COA) to file a second or successive federal habeas corpus for new claims for constitutional substantive violations of his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights proper

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was the denial of Petitioner's request for a Certificate of Appealibility (COA) to file a second or successive feredal habeas corpus for new claims for constitutional substantive vioalitions of his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights proper, OR did the Federal Disrtic Court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals fail to give their full consideration to the substantual evidence which the Accused has put forth in support of his prima facie case of a denial of his constutitional right to be competently represented by a qualified attorney at every stage of hsi court proceedings, and thereby the Courts sidestepped the appropriate process by first deciding the merits of his appeal as follows: that "Boswell fails to make the requisite prima facie showing. See §2244(b)(3)(C)." when the decision of the lower court made erroneously without first granting him a COA authorizing the Court of Appeals to review and, therefore, essentually deciding his appeal with out jurisdiction as was the issues presented in the Miller-El_ v Cockrell, 573 US 322 (2003) case? i : ae <y :