Robert Bello v. Rockland County, New York, et al.
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the Fourth Amendment is implicated where law enforcement refuses to release firearms surrendered for mental health reasons to a nonprohibited owner?
QUESTION PRESENTED In New York State, when a handgun licensee becomes the subject of a mental health report made pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.46, the state’s handgun licensing scheme (i) requires the licensing officer to suspend or revoke the handgun license; and (ii) requires the disqualified licensee to surrender all handguns, rifles, and shotguns to an appropriate law enforcement agency. N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(11); Mental Hygiene Law § 9.46. App-27. New York does not prohibit the return of surrendered firearms to another, non-prohibited, owner.! Yet, police departments refuse to release firearms and courts refuse to recognize the property and due process rights of the non-prohibited handgun owner. Rather, both require the handgun owner to try their hand in state court, but no state statute provides a post-deprivation procedure for the release of firearms surrendered under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(11)(b), (c). While there is Second Circuit precedent requiring the government to provide prompt post-deprivation due process for a once-disqualified individual to retrieve long guns [Panzella v. Sposato, 863 F.3d 210, 216 (2d Cir. 2017), as amended (July 18, 2017)] when handguns are at issue, neither the once-disqualified 1 Firearm owners who reside with an individual they know or have reason to know is prohibited from possessing a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1), (4), (8) or (9) shall is obligated by statute to properly secure their firearms from such individual. N.Y. Penal Law § 265.45. ii owner nor a non-prohibited owner of such handguns has recourse in the federal courts. The questions presented are: Whether the Fourth Amendment is implicated where law enforcement refuses to release firearms surrendered for mental health reasons to a nonprohibited owner? Whether the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process is violated where no prompt post-deprivation remedy exists to recover handguns surrendered based on the mental health disqualification of a separate owner?