Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Unlike the other case's Trial Court, such as Commissioner, Alabama | Department of Corrections, Petitioner vs. Matthew Reeves, Respondent's case, the Middlesex Superior Court and the other higher Courts, could have | ordered or summoned such Police or Federal agency and related laboratory , locations to see what was inside of my elderly mother's renewed U.S. Passport, but in order to let me, the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, to | prove my case, for the Middlesex Superior Court and all other higher Courts, But nothing was done about it. The questions presented are: 1. With due respect, when the very First Complaint was being dismissed, was it properly dismissed without asking the Pro Se Plaintiff, Ashley Y. Kim, then, about how she was not given any urgent and/or no alternative treatments, | on May 15, 2018, by the Respondent, Dr. Huong Tran, when she opened this | priority mail for her elderly mother, as she was not able to stand even with 2 | different walking canes, would keep vomit, being overly nauseous, just feeling very weak and uncomfortable, but as being the main interpreter for the Pro Se | Petitioner's elderly mother, at the 34 best hospital in the U.S. and the World, she is learning that there are medications to cure these types of deadly | situations... and when going to other hospitals, they are keep asking for my | elderly mother's preventing cancer cells from her entire body treatments, or | for any other urgent pain, she should always go to an Emergency Center, but the question remains, why didn't the Respondent, Dr. Huong Tran, did not forward the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, to an Emergency Center on May 15, 2018? (App. C. 7a) 2. Then, instead of providing any urgent treatments, by Dr. Huong Tran, on May 15, 2018, and even after, Dr. Huong Tran, decided to treat this incident as a mental/behavioral area, where all along, she said, she wanted to hook up the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, to obtain a $1,000, on a monthly basis from the Social Security and Disability Center, in order to keep fight with the Cambridge Housing Authority, just after meeting her colleague, another Respondent, Mary Ellen Smith, but Dr. Huong Tran, the Respondent, never ever mentioned how she will label me as someone who is diagnosed with a Chronic Paranoid Schizophrenia, or has that status, with 60 pages of wrongfully created damaged mental/behavioral medical records... Ever since July 2018, the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, requested all Courts in the 4 | Be Massachusetts, that she wanted these wrongfully created mental/behavioral medical records, to get fixed, deleted, or get amended, however, all Courts in Massachusetts, have Dismissed with Prejudice, of this request, when it will not cost anything for the Respondents, when that is allowed. 3. Therefore, as everybody and the World have turn their backs on the the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim... Could your most Honorable and most Genuine Supreme Court, would please make a difference in regards to the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.C(Yoo Hyang) Kim's | request or wish? | | This particular case was already dismissed with Prejudice against the | Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, by the very initial Honorable Judge, Christopher Barry-Smith, at the Middlesex Superior Court in Woburn, MA, a way before the Court Hearing with this newly arrived Honorable Judge, Kenneth J. Fishman on January 22, 2019. On that Court Hearing, the Honorable Judge, Kenneth J. Fishman stated the following: “So, if I understand her [the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y. Kim's] complaint, it's basically saying that she was wrongfully diagnosed by at least some of the Defendants: and that they created records with this wrongful [Chronic Paranoid Schizophrenia] diagnosis. And that those she is affected by the creation of these records, both emotionally and maybe in some other way. Why Just accept those facts for the pu